Re: [PHP-DEV] 3.1 cvs tree From: Michael Graff (explorer <email protected>)
Date: 05/26/98

Shane Caraveo <shane <email protected>> writes:

> I know dual commits will be a pain, but it is necessary to maintain 3.0
> stability while we work out some major issues for 3.1.

Why not use cvs to create a 3.0 branch, and maintain it there, while
using the mainline for 3.1 development? That would allow pulling changes
down from the 3.0 branch, or from the mainline up, and still keep the
two seperate.

It looks like you need a release engineer type person who "owns" the 3.0
branch, and pullup requests are made in the form of:

        Please pull up changes to foo.c between 1.42 and 1.44. Thanks.

--Michael