Date: 03/18/00
- Next message: rubys <email protected>: "Re: [PHP-DEV] RTLD_NOW !!!"
- Previous message: rubys <email protected>: "Re: [PHP-DEV] RTLD_NOW !!!"
- In reply to: rubys <email protected>: "Re: [PHP-DEV] RTLD_NOW !!!"
- Next in thread: rubys <email protected>: "Re: [PHP-DEV] RTLD_NOW !!!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 04:06 PM 3/18/00 -0500, rubys <email protected> wrote:
> >Anyone know why we use RTLD_NOW instead of RTLD_LAZY? Isn't the lazy one
> >faster when not all symbols are used.
>
>That explains all the problems I've been having with getting Java support
>to load lately!
>
>It used to work. What I was doing was a dlopen of the Java shared library
>before the first usage, based on ini file parameters. Now I don't get that
>far before I die... I'm trying to switch to using rpath, but I don't seem
>to have all the quirks out yet...
Hmm what do you mean? I think we have been using RTLD_NOW for a loooong
time. The only change I made today was in case RTLD_NOW doesn't exist to
use RTLD_LAZY. I always thought RTLD_LAZY is the better one of the two to
use, so that is why I asked :)
Andi
--- Andi Gutmans <andi <email protected>> http://www.zend.com/-- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-dev-unsubscribe <email protected> For additional commands, e-mail: php-dev-help <email protected> To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin <email protected>
- Next message: rubys <email protected>: "Re: [PHP-DEV] RTLD_NOW !!!"
- Previous message: rubys <email protected>: "Re: [PHP-DEV] RTLD_NOW !!!"
- In reply to: rubys <email protected>: "Re: [PHP-DEV] RTLD_NOW !!!"
- Next in thread: rubys <email protected>: "Re: [PHP-DEV] RTLD_NOW !!!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

