Date: 08/28/00
- Next message: Bug Database: "[PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #6395 Updated: accessing mappings fail!"
- Previous message: Bug Database: "[PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #6156 Updated: Object loosing an array property"
- In reply to: Stig S. Bakken: "Re: [PHP-DEV] feature : get_include_history () (was : Re:[PHP-DEV] included_by() possible?)"
- Next in thread: André Langhorst: "[PHP-DEV] feature : another debug feature, was: get_include_history()"
- Reply: André Langhorst: "[PHP-DEV] feature : another debug feature, was: get_include_history()"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 10:22 28/08/00 +0200, Stig S. Bakken wrote:
>Andi,
>
>There more language features that are optional through INI directives,
>the harder it gets to produce a working code library like PEAR. Just
>wanted to remind you. Is the overhead worse than some stack operations
>when using include/require?
I agree that it we should minimize the amount of INI directives. Let's try
and use our brains after 4.0.2 and see what is really needed.
Andi
--- Andi Gutmans <andi <email protected>> http://www.zend.com/-- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-dev-unsubscribe <email protected> For additional commands, e-mail: php-dev-help <email protected> To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin <email protected>
- Next message: Bug Database: "[PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #6395 Updated: accessing mappings fail!"
- Previous message: Bug Database: "[PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #6156 Updated: Object loosing an array property"
- In reply to: Stig S. Bakken: "Re: [PHP-DEV] feature : get_include_history () (was : Re:[PHP-DEV] included_by() possible?)"
- Next in thread: André Langhorst: "[PHP-DEV] feature : another debug feature, was: get_include_history()"
- Reply: André Langhorst: "[PHP-DEV] feature : another debug feature, was: get_include_history()"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

