Date: 11/09/00
- Next message: ignacio <email protected>: "[PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #7728: Dynamic function names"
- Previous message: Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams: "Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #7702: mail fail sending with externalsmtp server"
- In reply to: void: "Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #7720 Updated: Return address instackoverwritten?"
- Next in thread: Derick Rethans: "Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #7720 Updated: Return address instackoverwritten?"
- Reply: Derick Rethans: "Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #7720 Updated: Return address instackoverwritten?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To summarize:
there's no way I'm living with software that overwrites it's own stack
even if it's damn hard to write an exploit for it.
Nor will I accept software crashing when error messages would be
about right.
In 15 years of programming I never accepted software with such design.
Even Turbo Pascal had stack checking 10 years ago, so why is it
impossible to implement such thing in a modern programming language.
-- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-dev-unsubscribe <email protected> For additional commands, e-mail: php-dev-help <email protected> To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin <email protected>
- Next message: ignacio <email protected>: "[PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #7728: Dynamic function names"
- Previous message: Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams: "Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #7702: mail fail sending with externalsmtp server"
- In reply to: void: "Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #7720 Updated: Return address instackoverwritten?"
- Next in thread: Derick Rethans: "Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #7720 Updated: Return address instackoverwritten?"
- Reply: Derick Rethans: "Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #7720 Updated: Return address instackoverwritten?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

