Date: 11/13/00
- Next message: Andrei Zmievski: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Fwd: [PHP] upload_max_size vs. post_max_size"
- Previous message: root <email protected>: "[PHP-DEV] CVS Account Request"
- In reply to: Andi Gutmans: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Fwd: [PHP] upload_max_size vs. post_max_size"
- Next in thread: Andrei Zmievski: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Fwd: [PHP] upload_max_size vs. post_max_size"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hello,
Andi Gutmans wrote:
> Yes I already found it with cvsweb.
> I prefer not having both of these options but just one.
> Language wise it makes more sense to keep the post_max_size directive
> because it includes everything and not only file uploads but as
> people have
> always used upload_max_size it might be better to keep the old name.
> Also the main question is if it is better to only have one option. They
> actually aren't completely the same. The post_max_size checks the
> content_length and makes sure it's not longer than the directive, the
> upload_max_size is checked in rfc1867.c to see if the uploaded
> file doesn't
> exceed a certain size.
> At least to me it's not obvious how to deal with it.
> Discussion?
Both are useful. I guess it can be confusing, but thats why we
have documentation. :)
IMHO, keep both, and document them in detail.
Regards
Mike Robinson
-- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-dev-unsubscribe <email protected> For additional commands, e-mail: php-dev-help <email protected> To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin <email protected>
- Next message: Andrei Zmievski: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Fwd: [PHP] upload_max_size vs. post_max_size"
- Previous message: root <email protected>: "[PHP-DEV] CVS Account Request"
- In reply to: Andi Gutmans: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Fwd: [PHP] upload_max_size vs. post_max_size"
- Next in thread: Andrei Zmievski: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Fwd: [PHP] upload_max_size vs. post_max_size"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

