Re: [PHP-DEV] Fwd: [PHP] upload_max_size vs. post_max_size From: Andrei Zmievski (andrei <email protected>)
Date: 11/13/00

On Mon, 13 Nov 2000, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> I prefer not having both of these options but just one.
> Language wise it makes more sense to keep the post_max_size directive
> because it includes everything and not only file uploads but as people have
> always used upload_max_size it might be better to keep the old name.
> Also the main question is if it is better to only have one option. They
> actually aren't completely the same. The post_max_size checks the
> content_length and makes sure it's not longer than the directive, the
> upload_max_size is checked in rfc1867.c to see if the uploaded file doesn't
> exceed a certain size.
> At least to me it's not obvious how to deal with it.
> Discussion?

Can we always rely on content-length header being truthful?

-Andrei
* Gun manufacturers don't make bad products, bad parents do. * 

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-dev-unsubscribe <email protected>
For additional commands, e-mail: php-dev-help <email protected>
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin <email protected>