 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
Date: 12/13/00
- Next message: Adam Haberlach: "[PHP-DEV] Addition of pg_lotell() and pg_loseek?"
- Previous message: arnoldguo <email protected>: "[PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #8246: OCILogOff() cann't free the conection with Oracle8"
- In reply to: Zeev Suraski: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Calling parent's constructor"
- Next in thread: Kristian Köhntopp: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Calling parent's constructor"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 01:07 AM 12/14/00 +0200, Zeev Suraski wrote:
Are you nuts?!
>:)
>
>Seriously, I think it makes sense. Calling the parent constructor is
>basic functionality and should be easy to do. Hell, it's even easy to
>implement.
>
>I think we should wait for 4.0.5 for this. What's the consensus?
That's fine -- but with branches you can put the code into HEAD right now
and not wait.. Oh, Zend doesn't have branches. :)
-Andrei
-- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-dev-unsubscribe <email protected> For additional commands, e-mail: php-dev-help <email protected> To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin <email protected>
- Next message: Adam Haberlach: "[PHP-DEV] Addition of pg_lotell() and pg_loseek?"
- Previous message: arnoldguo <email protected>: "[PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #8246: OCILogOff() cann't free the conection with Oracle8"
- In reply to: Zeev Suraski: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Calling parent's constructor"
- Next in thread: Kristian Köhntopp: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Calling parent's constructor"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]