Date: 12/13/00
- Next message: Zak Greant: "[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] Calling parent's constructor"
- Previous message: Adam Haberlach: "[PHP-DEV] Addition of pg_lotell() and pg_loseek?"
- In reply to: Sascha Schumann: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Calling parent's constructor"
- Next in thread: Zak Greant: "[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] Calling parent's constructor"
- Reply: Zak Greant: "[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] Calling parent's constructor"
- Reply: Joey Smith: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Calling parent's constructor"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I'm with Sasch here. I don't want this in 4.0.4 at this point.
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Sascha Schumann wrote the following to Zeev Suraski :
> > Seriously, I think it makes sense. Calling the parent constructor is basic
> > functionality and should be easy to do. Hell, it's even easy to implement.
>
> ++1.
>
> > I think we should wait for 4.0.5 for this. What's the consensus?
>
> 4.0.5. If you want to push it into Zend right now, I'd like
> to create a branch on cvs.zend.com for the Zend repository.
>
> - Sascha
>
>
>
-- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-dev-unsubscribe <email protected> For additional commands, e-mail: php-dev-help <email protected> To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin <email protected>
- Next message: Zak Greant: "[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] Calling parent's constructor"
- Previous message: Adam Haberlach: "[PHP-DEV] Addition of pg_lotell() and pg_loseek?"
- In reply to: Sascha Schumann: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Calling parent's constructor"
- Next in thread: Zak Greant: "[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] Calling parent's constructor"
- Reply: Zak Greant: "[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] Calling parent's constructor"
- Reply: Joey Smith: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Calling parent's constructor"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

