Date: 12/17/00
- Next message: André Langhorst: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] convention about function naming II"
- Previous message: eschmid+sic <email protected>: "[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] convention about function naming II"
- In reply to: André Langhorst: "[PHP-DEV] convention about function naming II"
- Next in thread: Andi Gutmans: "Re: [PHP-DEV] convention about function naming II"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, 17 Dec 2000, André Langhorst wrote:
> I have searched through almost all extensions and discovered the
> following things:
>
> [snip]
>
> c) I would suggest not to use very long function names to make people
> angry eg. "filepro","ingres","opensll","ovrimos","satellite" - I
> personally prefer using "fp","ingr","ossl","ovr" or "sat" is there any
> convention about this?
And I (as the author of Satellite) personally prefer to spell out
everything to make it as unambigous as possible... :-)
> [snap]
Regards,
-\- David Eriksson -/-
"An expert in a particular computer language is really an expert
in the work-arounds necessary to use this language to perform
useful work." - Richard B. Johnson
-- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-dev-unsubscribe <email protected> For additional commands, e-mail: php-dev-help <email protected> To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin <email protected>
- Next message: André Langhorst: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] convention about function naming II"
- Previous message: eschmid+sic <email protected>: "[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] convention about function naming II"
- In reply to: André Langhorst: "[PHP-DEV] convention about function naming II"
- Next in thread: Andi Gutmans: "Re: [PHP-DEV] convention about function naming II"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

