Date: 12/17/00
- Next message: Rasmus Lerdorf: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] convention about function naming II"
- Previous message: Andi Gutmans: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Strange conversion"
- In reply to: André Langhorst: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] convention about function naming II"
- Next in thread: Rasmus Lerdorf: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] convention about function naming II"
- Reply: Rasmus Lerdorf: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] convention about function naming II"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, Dec 17, 2000 at 07:47:30PM +0100, André Langhorst wrote:
> > b) exif - read_exif_data (only one function)
> >
> > It will be more functions in the near future.
>
> shouldn't all these then be renamed to exif_* ? instead of
> write_exif_*, whatever?
I think, we have only one user and this is the author himself. Anyway it
is a not so a good example. We have "mysql_*", "ingres_*" and so on. We
can only have some discussions with the rest of the function names. For
MySQL we have the official function name "mysql_list_tables" but you can
use the old name "mysql_listtables".
-Egon
-- http://www.linuxtag.de/ http://php.net/books.php http://www.concert-band.de/-- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-dev-unsubscribe <email protected> For additional commands, e-mail: php-dev-help <email protected> To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin <email protected>
- Next message: Rasmus Lerdorf: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] convention about function naming II"
- Previous message: Andi Gutmans: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Strange conversion"
- In reply to: André Langhorst: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] convention about function naming II"
- Next in thread: Rasmus Lerdorf: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] convention about function naming II"
- Reply: Rasmus Lerdorf: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] convention about function naming II"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

