 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
Date: 12/17/00
- Next message: andi <email protected>: "[PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #8247 Updated: one line comment ending in ??> vs ???>"
- Previous message: marycarter9991 <email protected>: "[PHP-DEV] about foreign search engines"
- In reply to: André Langhorst: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] convention about function naming II"
- Next in thread: Hartmut Holzgraefe: "[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] convention about function naming II"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 19:47 17/12/00 +0100, André Langhorst wrote:
>>b) exif - read_exif_data (only one function)
>>
>>It will be more functions in the near future.
>
>shouldn't all these then be renamed to exif_* ? instead of
>write_exif_*, whatever?
Yes I think it should.
Andi
--- Andi Gutmans <andi <email protected>> http://www.zend.com/-- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-dev-unsubscribe <email protected> For additional commands, e-mail: php-dev-help <email protected> To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin <email protected>
- Next message: andi <email protected>: "[PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #8247 Updated: one line comment ending in ??> vs ???>"
- Previous message: marycarter9991 <email protected>: "[PHP-DEV] about foreign search engines"
- In reply to: André Langhorst: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] convention about function naming II"
- Next in thread: Hartmut Holzgraefe: "[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] convention about function naming II"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]