Date: 12/18/00
- Next message: Andrei Zmievski: "[PHP-DEV] this_ptr question"
- Previous message: Paul Gardiner: "[PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 4.0 Bug #6163 Updated: Unable to compile with INFORMIX"
- In reply to: Andi Gutmans: "[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] convention about function naming II"
- Next in thread: Hartmut Holzgraefe: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] convention about function naming II"
- Reply: Hartmut Holzgraefe: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] convention about function naming II"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Yes, definitely.
Zeev
At 18:25 18/12/2000, Andi Gutmans wrote:
>I prefer making function name changes *before* people use them. Also
>you're unlikely to break stuff. I would put it in 4.0.4.
>
>Andi
>
>At 15:40 18/12/00 +0100, Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
>>eschmid+sic <email protected> wrote:
>> > > 2) unconventional function naming caught:
>> > >
>> > > a) ctype - already mentioned in README that the author (Harmut) does not
>> > > know if adding a prefix or using C-Names is preferable, I think both are
>> > > valid
>> >
>> > I know Hartmut very well. It seems he is knowing himself what he is doing.
>>
>>ctype is an execption in that it provides some functions that are
>>in very common use in C so that they might perhpas deserve to keep
>>their names that we are all used to,
>>
>>but on the other hand they do collide with the variable information
>>functions like isset() or is_string()
>>
>>so i did want to rename theese to ctype_*() but didn't make it in time
>>before the 4.0.4RCs where rolled out, so it's C-ish style for now
>>
>>but both the README and the EXPERIMENTAL files in ext/ctype say that
>>changes may still happen, so it's not finally decided yet ...
>>(thats what the EXPERIMENTAL files are for anyway ...)
>>
>>--
>>Hartmut Holzgraefe hartmut <email protected> http://www.six.de +49-711-99091-77
>>
>>--
>>PHP Quality Assurance Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-qa-unsubscribe <email protected>
>>For additional commands, e-mail: php-qa-help <email protected>
>>To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin <email protected>
>
>---
>Andi Gutmans <andi <email protected>>
>http://www.zend.com/
>
>--
>PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-dev-unsubscribe <email protected>
>For additional commands, e-mail: php-dev-help <email protected>
>To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin <email protected>
-- Zeev Suraski <zeev <email protected>> CTO & co-founder, Zend Technologies Ltd. http://www.zend.com/-- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-dev-unsubscribe <email protected> For additional commands, e-mail: php-dev-help <email protected> To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin <email protected>
- Next message: Andrei Zmievski: "[PHP-DEV] this_ptr question"
- Previous message: Paul Gardiner: "[PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 4.0 Bug #6163 Updated: Unable to compile with INFORMIX"
- In reply to: Andi Gutmans: "[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] convention about function naming II"
- Next in thread: Hartmut Holzgraefe: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] convention about function naming II"
- Reply: Hartmut Holzgraefe: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] convention about function naming II"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

