Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] convention about function naming II From: Hartmut Holzgraefe (hartmut <email protected>)
Date: 12/19/00

i've now changed the developement branch accordingly
(including the regression tests)

what is the current policy regarding the RC-Branch?

Zeev Suraski wrote:
>
> Yes, definitely.
>
> Zeev
>
> At 18:25 18/12/2000, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> >I prefer making function name changes *before* people use them. Also
> >you're unlikely to break stuff. I would put it in 4.0.4.
> >
> >Andi
> >
> >At 15:40 18/12/00 +0100, Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
> >>ctype is an execption in that it provides some functions that are
> >>in very common use in C so that they might perhpas deserve to keep
> >>their names that we are all used to,
> >>
> >>but on the other hand they do collide with the variable information
> >>functions like isset() or is_string()
> >>
> >>so i did want to rename theese to ctype_*() but didn't make it in time
> >>before the 4.0.4RCs where rolled out, so it's C-ish style for now
> >>
> >>but both the README and the EXPERIMENTAL files in ext/ctype say that
> >>changes may still happen, so it's not finally decided yet ...
> >>(thats what the EXPERIMENTAL files are for anyway ...) 

-- 
Hartmut Holzgraefe  hartmut <email protected>  http://www.six.de  +49-711-99091-77

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-dev-unsubscribe <email protected>
For additional commands, e-mail: php-dev-help <email protected>
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin <email protected>