[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] RE: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.4 Release (Summary of thoughts) From: Andi Gutmans (andi <email protected>)
Date: 12/20/00

Hmm I don't think anyone realized because Sascha didn't stop the release
and fix those function prototypes. Oh well. And it wasn't announced on php-dev.
How about putting the 4.0.4 NEWS section on the downloads page so that for
a change people will be able to see what's new where they download? (It
will hopefully make more people read it and prevent them from getting
bitten by changes). Can someone please do it? And maybe at the same time we
should update the front page.

Andi

At 07:25 PM 12/20/00 +0000, James Moore wrote:
>s/4.0.4/4.0.5 :) Didnt realise it had been released.. maybe we should next
>time have a post to the two lists stating that its going out the door and
>time 24 hours for anyone to raise any objections.
>
>James
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: James Moore [mailto:jmoore <email protected>]
> > Sent: 20 December 2000 19:21
> > To: PHP Quality Assurance Team Mailing List; PHP Developers Mailing List
> > Subject: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.4 Release (Summary of thoughts)
> >
> >
> > There seems to be a few things being talk about before the 4.0.4
> > release. I
> > saw sascha commited some changes earlier but I think ALL changes should be
> > made and perhaps depreciate some of the older functions that have been
> > changed, check all the function names in the manual, update them to the
> > official standard then think about 4.0.4, there is very little
> > change in the
> > sources to be done some renaming and alias' to be added, PS I think rather
> > than aliasing the official names depreciated names should be
> > aliased to the
> > offical name and a comment as to when they were depreciated
> > should be added
> > (IE Version number) for future reference. 4.0.4 IMHO Should not
> > be released
> > until this is done then we can chuck a new msg on the front of
> > PHP.net make
> > sure its in the newfiles and try to get as many people to know about it as
> > possible. But I dont think the depreciated names should be listed on the
> > manual page. If people really want this to be the case then add another
> > appendix of depreciated functions with a note to when they were
> > depreciated.
> >
> > --
> > James Moore
> > PHP Quality Assurance Team
> > jmoore <email protected>
> >
> >
> > --
> > PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-dev-unsubscribe <email protected>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: php-dev-help <email protected>
> > To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin <email protected>
>
>
>--
>PHP Quality Assurance Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-qa-unsubscribe <email protected>
>For additional commands, e-mail: php-qa-help <email protected>
>To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin <email protected> 

---
Andi Gutmans <andi <email protected>>
http://www.zend.com/

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-dev-unsubscribe <email protected>
For additional commands, e-mail: php-dev-help <email protected>
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin <email protected>