Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Naming changes. From: Jim Winstead (jimw <email protected>)
Date: 01/02/01

In article <5.0.2.1.2.20001228180205.035c03b8 <email protected>>,
zeev <email protected> wrote:
> So far, changes in the major version number were due to serious
> architecture changes. Changes in the minor version number were planned
> (for 3.1) but never actually executed, and they also involved
> architecture
> changes, but not major ones. Mostly everything else falls in the
> miniversion (3rd digit) category, we'll have dozens of those in the
> future.

why not just starting incrementing the second number on major releases
(where i'd define major as something going through the
multiple-release-candidate process like 4.0.4 did), and using that last
number for those "patchlevel" releases that are never supposed to happen?

(really, i don't care. just seems silly to have a number in the middle
that nobody knows when to use, and the "pl1" thing always irked me.)

jim 

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-dev-unsubscribe <email protected>
For additional commands, e-mail: php-dev-help <email protected>
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin <email protected>