Date: 01/10/01
- Next message: boyan <email protected>: "[PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #8633: phpinfo() output different from php.exe -i"
- Previous message: timperator <email protected>: "[PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #8632: Error Message"
- In reply to: Cynic: "Re: [PHP-DEV] call_builtin_function_array() possible?"
- Next in thread: Cynic: "[PHP-DEV] Re: ++$i++ (was Re: [PHP-DEV] call_builtin_function_array() possible?)"
- Reply: Cynic: "[PHP-DEV] Re: ++$i++ (was Re: [PHP-DEV] call_builtin_function_array() possible?)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Could you explain how this construct is useful? I can't think of any real
world situation in which it's useful or even remotely makes sense. What
would it even do? Remember, an expression has only one value.
Zeev
At 14:51 10/1/2001, Cynic wrote:
>Well, this would be probably completely useless (at least I
>can't think of a meaningful use of this right now), but... is
>there a reason this can't be implemented in PHP? I know, time
>is a very precious commodity, and I wouldn't ask (or suggest)
>for an implementation of this if it would require extra work
>besides making pre- and post- increment / decrement in one
>statement. But if allowing ++$i++ (which I definitely consider
>useful) makes ++$i-- possible without additional effort, why
>disable it? It's possible to write completely useless junk
>software without this feature too.
>
>Lack of knowledge of C prevents me from going to try and do
>this myself.
>
>
>At 21:51 9.1. 2001, Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote the following:
>--------------------------------------------------------------
> >Cynic wrote:
> >>
> >> At 21:16 9.1. 2001, Andrei Zmievski wrote the following:
> >> >What color is the sky on your planet? :)
> >>
> >> I don't know, haven't checked for some time now. :)
> >> But seriously: I'm not familiar with C, nor the way this stuff
> >> is implemented in PHP, however, whether the sky here is blue or
> >> pink doesn't mean I think this wouldn't be useful.
> >
> >and what's next?
> >
> >++$i-- ???
> >
> >--
> >Hartmut Holzgraefe hartmut <email protected> http://www.six.de +49-711-99091-77
> >
> >--
> >PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-dev-unsubscribe <email protected>
> >For additional commands, e-mail: php-dev-help <email protected>
> >To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin <email protected>
>------end of quote------
>
>
>
>____________________________________________________________
>Cynic:
>
>A member of a group of ancient Greek philosophers who taught
>that virtue constitutes happiness and that self control is
>the essential part of virtue.
>
>cynic <email protected>
>
>
>
>--
>PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-dev-unsubscribe <email protected>
>For additional commands, e-mail: php-dev-help <email protected>
>To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin <email protected>
-- Zeev Suraski <zeev <email protected>> CTO & co-founder, Zend Technologies Ltd. http://www.zend.com/-- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-dev-unsubscribe <email protected> For additional commands, e-mail: php-dev-help <email protected> To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin <email protected>
- Next message: boyan <email protected>: "[PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #8633: phpinfo() output different from php.exe -i"
- Previous message: timperator <email protected>: "[PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #8632: Error Message"
- In reply to: Cynic: "Re: [PHP-DEV] call_builtin_function_array() possible?"
- Next in thread: Cynic: "[PHP-DEV] Re: ++$i++ (was Re: [PHP-DEV] call_builtin_function_array() possible?)"
- Reply: Cynic: "[PHP-DEV] Re: ++$i++ (was Re: [PHP-DEV] call_builtin_function_array() possible?)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

