[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.4pl1 RC2 rolled From: James Moore (jmoore <email protected>)
Date: 01/10/01

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Lynch [mailto:richard <email protected>]
> Sent: 10 January 2001 20:51
> To: Zeev Suraski; Cynic
> Cc: php-qa <email protected>; php-dev <email protected>
> Subject: Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.4pl1 RC2 rolled
>
>
> > environment, and win32 mod_php4 happens to be rock solid (when
>
> Is PHP ISAPI rock-solid now?...
>
> That's not the general impression I've received: If it depends on which
> other modules/technoligies you use, that needs to be documented pretty
> heavily before one could really call it rock-solid. And that's the way I
> understand it to be at this time.
>
> While I think PHP ISAPI is important, perhaps even critical, I
> don't want a
> billion Windows users to download it because we said it was solid and find
> out differently for the technology they need to use it with.
> They'll never
> come back.

I wouldnt say rock solid but Ive done a few million requests to it with
fairly complex scripts (mainly benchmarking) and on a well set up Win 2k
system with IIS 5 PHP ISAPI module is very stable, I think that Zeev finds
this too. I do not know if I would like to see it in production enviroment
yet but under Win 2k IIS5 it seems Good. Under NT 4 AFAIK it is terrible for
some unknown reasons. If we can get the few win issues sorted then I think
maybe then it will be up to product standards under win2k and IIS 5. (I can
never seem to reproduce IIS ISAPI bugs which annoys me :()

Just my £0.02

James 

--
James Moore
PHP Quality Assurance Team
jmoore <email protected>

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-dev-unsubscribe <email protected>
For additional commands, e-mail: php-dev-help <email protected>
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin <email protected>