Date: 01/15/01
- Next message: Zeev Suraski: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Legal solution: RE: [PHP-DEV] Non-GPL readline"
- Previous message: Anil Madhavapeddy: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Legal solution: RE: [PHP-DEV] Non-GPL readline"
- In reply to: Hartmut Holzgraefe: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Legal solution: RE: [PHP-DEV] Non-GPL readline"
- Next in thread: Zeev Suraski: "RE: [PHP-DEV] Legal solution: RE: [PHP-DEV] Non-GPL readline"
- Reply: Zeev Suraski: "RE: [PHP-DEV] Legal solution: RE: [PHP-DEV] Non-GPL readline"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> but trying to redefiny the terms of use others have
> put on their code to fit our needs is a very bad idea
> IMHO
Under whose jurisdiction would any GNU GPL licience issue be resolved?, a US
court might have a different view of what is derivative work to an
British/French court which could contradict or at least not be compatible
with each other, I can see no mention of the jurisdiction that these issues
should be resolved in..
James
-- James Moore PHP Quality Assurance Team jmoore <email protected>-- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-dev-unsubscribe <email protected> For additional commands, e-mail: php-dev-help <email protected> To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin <email protected>
- Next message: Zeev Suraski: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Legal solution: RE: [PHP-DEV] Non-GPL readline"
- Previous message: Anil Madhavapeddy: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Legal solution: RE: [PHP-DEV] Non-GPL readline"
- In reply to: Hartmut Holzgraefe: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Legal solution: RE: [PHP-DEV] Non-GPL readline"
- Next in thread: Zeev Suraski: "RE: [PHP-DEV] Legal solution: RE: [PHP-DEV] Non-GPL readline"
- Reply: Zeev Suraski: "RE: [PHP-DEV] Legal solution: RE: [PHP-DEV] Non-GPL readline"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

