[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] ctype function (re?)naming From: James Moore (jmoore <email protected>)
Date: 02/26/01

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stanislav Malyshev [mailto:stas <email protected>]
> Sent: 26 February 2001 09:52
> To: Hartmut Holzgraefe
> Cc: php-dev <email protected>; php-qa <email protected>
> Subject: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] ctype function (re?)naming
>
>
> HH>> RFC: what should their names be in 4.0.5?
> HH>>
> HH>> ( ) stay with ctype_alpha() ...
> HH>> (X) switch to ctype_isalpha() ...
> HH>> ( ) switch to ctype_isalpha() ... and have ctype_alpha() aliases
> HH>> ( ) switch to ctype_is_alpha() ...
> HH>> ( ) switch to ctype_is_alpha() ... and have ctype_alpha() aliases
> HH>> ( ) ____________________________________(fill in your idea here)
>
> And add isalpha alias for it.

This is not in line with the other is_* functions. To keep in line with
those I feel whatever we choose it should be ctype_is_* no is* as this is
used to mean a different test (isset) under the variable functions.

James 

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-dev-unsubscribe <email protected>
For additional commands, e-mail: php-dev-help <email protected>
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin <email protected>