Date: 05/10/01
- Next message: Liz: "[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Modifications to Windows Readme file"
- Previous message: Phil Driscoll: "[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Modifications to Windows Readme file"
- In reply to: Cynic: "[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Modifications to Windows Readme file"
- Next in thread: Phil Driscoll: "[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Modifications to Windows Readme file"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> I don't think so, it looks ok.
> But I must admit that I prefer plaintext readme's... But that's
> just me.
Depends, for a unix system, I'd agree, I dont want a HTML one, but for
windows, its nice to have one you can easily skip to bits. So, in this case,
Id say it was worth it. As every windows machine has file association and a
browser to view it with.
-- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-dev-unsubscribe <email protected> For additional commands, e-mail: php-dev-help <email protected> To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin <email protected>
- Next message: Liz: "[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Modifications to Windows Readme file"
- Previous message: Phil Driscoll: "[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Modifications to Windows Readme file"
- In reply to: Cynic: "[PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Modifications to Windows Readme file"
- Next in thread: Phil Driscoll: "[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Modifications to Windows Readme file"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

