Date: 05/17/01
- Next message: Andi Gutmans: "RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] PHP 4.0.6RC1 ready for testing"
- Previous message: Andi Gutmans: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Latest commit -- depreciation of call_user_method()"
- In reply to: Daniel Beulshausen: "Re: [PHP-DEV] sockets extension"
- Next in thread: Wez Furlong: "Re: [PHP-DEV] sockets extension"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 10:34 PM 5/16/2001 +0200, Daniel Beulshausen wrote:
>At 22:49 16.05.2001 +0300, Andi Gutmans wrote:
>>Daniel,
>>
>>Would it make sense to try to integrate the new php_streams into this
>>extension?
>>It might give php_streams a push and I'm sure Wez would work with you
>>fixing any remaining issues.
>>It would be a nice test bed.
>>What do you think?
>>
>>About backwards compatibility, without having read the code it sounds as
>>if you're doing "the right thing" as opposed to the old module. Do any of
>>the new function names overlap with the old ones? I'm not quite sure how
>>we should tackle backwards compatibility here.
>
>forgot to answer that, no the new function names don't overlap,
>thereprefixed i.e.
>socket -> socket_create
>fd_dealloc -> socket_fd_free
>create_listen_sock -> socket_create_listen
The names sound good. That's for sure :)
Andi
-- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-dev-unsubscribe <email protected> For additional commands, e-mail: php-dev-help <email protected> To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin <email protected>
- Next message: Andi Gutmans: "RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] PHP 4.0.6RC1 ready for testing"
- Previous message: Andi Gutmans: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Latest commit -- depreciation of call_user_method()"
- In reply to: Daniel Beulshausen: "Re: [PHP-DEV] sockets extension"
- Next in thread: Wez Furlong: "Re: [PHP-DEV] sockets extension"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

