Date: 05/24/01
- Next message: swm <email protected>: "[PHP-DEV] Bug #11075 Updated: bad operation of nl2br function"
- Previous message: swm <email protected>: "[PHP-DEV] Bug #11075 Updated: bad operation of nl2br function"
- In reply to: Brian Tanner: "RE: [PHP-DEV] Bug #11075: bad operation of nl2br function"
- Next in thread: Daniel Beckham: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Bug #11075: bad operation of nl2br function"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
It would be a poor browser design which differentiated between <br> and
<br />. I've just tested with old versions of netscape (4.0 series) and a
friend is digging up some 2.* and 3.* style browsers just to verify.
Gavin
On Thu, 24 May 2001, Brian Tanner wrote:
> Ok, I've seen this "bug" reported too many times to sit idly by.
>
> :)
>
> The <br /> has the "/" so that the html is XHTML compliant. (if memory
> serves)
>
> My question -- is this breaking anything for anyone? Is <br /> in any way
> detrimental to browsers anywhere?
>
> Brian Tanner
> Project Manager
> Zaam Internet Solutions
>
>
>
-- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-dev-unsubscribe <email protected> For additional commands, e-mail: php-dev-help <email protected> To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin <email protected>
- Next message: swm <email protected>: "[PHP-DEV] Bug #11075 Updated: bad operation of nl2br function"
- Previous message: swm <email protected>: "[PHP-DEV] Bug #11075 Updated: bad operation of nl2br function"
- In reply to: Brian Tanner: "RE: [PHP-DEV] Bug #11075: bad operation of nl2br function"
- Next in thread: Daniel Beckham: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Bug #11075: bad operation of nl2br function"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

