Date: 07/04/01
- Next message: Sascha Schumann: "Re: [PHP-DEV] trans-sid and Location: Header"
- Previous message: Björn Schotte: "Re: [PHP-DEV] trans-sid and Location: Header"
- In reply to: Björn Schotte: "Re: [PHP-DEV] trans-sid and Location: Header"
- Next in thread: derick <email protected>: "Re: [PHP-DEV] trans-sid and Location: Header"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Björn Schotte wrote:
> * Björn Schotte wrote:
> > http://$HTTP_HOST/foo isn't a "relative" link because
>
> ^^^^^^
> Erm, I mean "external".
Sure it isn't. but I fear trans-sid doesn't see it that way. AFAIK it
distinguishes between relative and external links by the presence of
the protocol-name (http:// or https://) in the url.
Correct me if I'm wrong.
This is far from perfect, of course, since _all_ urls, no matter where
they point to, should be "complete" and contain the protocol-name.
Trans-sid's behaviour encourages (makes it necessary, even) to use
incomplete urls.
But which other way is there?
regards
Wagner
-- Madness takes its toll. Please have exact change.-- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-dev-unsubscribe <email protected> For additional commands, e-mail: php-dev-help <email protected> To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin <email protected>
- Next message: Sascha Schumann: "Re: [PHP-DEV] trans-sid and Location: Header"
- Previous message: Björn Schotte: "Re: [PHP-DEV] trans-sid and Location: Header"
- In reply to: Björn Schotte: "Re: [PHP-DEV] trans-sid and Location: Header"
- Next in thread: derick <email protected>: "Re: [PHP-DEV] trans-sid and Location: Header"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

