Date: 08/04/01
- Next message: andy <email protected>: "[PHP-DEV] Bug #12530 Updated: Shuffle shouldn't use the least significant bit of rand()"
- Previous message: Jeroen van Wolffelaar: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Bug #12566 Updated: Cascaded ternaries evaluate incorrectly"
- In reply to: Jeroen van Wolffelaar: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Bug #12566 Updated: Cascaded ternaries evaluate incorrectly"
- Next in thread: jeroen <email protected>: "[PHP-DEV] Bug #12566 Updated: Cascaded ternaries evaluate incorrectly"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, 5 Aug 2001, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?w=4&r=1&s=trachtenberg&q=a ,
> I could only find messages about break/continue in switch statements...
The subject line is misleading. We shifted into talking about ?:.
See me at the bottom of:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=php-dev&m=97896924723440&w=4
and the follow ups.
-adam
-- adam maccabee trachtenberg adam <email protected>-- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-dev-unsubscribe <email protected> For additional commands, e-mail: php-dev-help <email protected> To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin <email protected>
- Next message: andy <email protected>: "[PHP-DEV] Bug #12530 Updated: Shuffle shouldn't use the least significant bit of rand()"
- Previous message: Jeroen van Wolffelaar: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Bug #12566 Updated: Cascaded ternaries evaluate incorrectly"
- In reply to: Jeroen van Wolffelaar: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Bug #12566 Updated: Cascaded ternaries evaluate incorrectly"
- Next in thread: jeroen <email protected>: "[PHP-DEV] Bug #12566 Updated: Cascaded ternaries evaluate incorrectly"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

