Date: 08/08/01
- Next message: Zeev Suraski: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: The new $_GET/POST/ENV (was: Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 / NEWS...)"
- Previous message: Jason Greene: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: The new $_GET/POST/ENV (was: Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 / NEWS...)"
- Next in thread: Jani Taskinen: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: The new $_GET/POST/ENV (was: Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 / NEWS...)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 21:14 08-08-01, Jani Taskinen wrote:
>On Wed, 8 Aug 2001, Cynic wrote:
>
> >At 20:02 8/8/2001, Zeev Suraski wrote the following:
> >--------------------------------------------------------------
> >>At 21:01 08-08-01, Jani Taskinen wrote:
> >>
> >>>[moving this to php-dev]
> >>>
> >>>First: Great! Woohoo! Thanks Zeev!
> >>
> >>Andi helped with it too :)
> >>
> >>I vote for $_EVIL :)
> >
> >How about $_DONT_TOUCH_THIS ? :)
> >Seriously though, I vote for $_REQUEST. After all, it contains
> >data which is (generally) tied to one particular request...
>
>This reminds me that should the $_FILES be included in this
>data too? As it's also something you shouldn't trust and
>it's also coming from the user.
Yep, $_FILES should probably be there too.
Zeev
-- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-dev-unsubscribe <email protected> For additional commands, e-mail: php-dev-help <email protected> To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin <email protected>
- Next message: Zeev Suraski: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: The new $_GET/POST/ENV (was: Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 / NEWS...)"
- Previous message: Jason Greene: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: The new $_GET/POST/ENV (was: Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 / NEWS...)"
- Next in thread: Jani Taskinen: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: The new $_GET/POST/ENV (was: Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 / NEWS...)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

