Date: 08/10/01
- Next message: Brian Moore: "[PHP-DEV] profiler?"
- Previous message: Rasmus Lerdorf: "[PHP-DEV] PHP vs. Zend paranoia?"
- In reply to: Rasmus Lerdorf: "[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/sablot php_sablot.h"
- Next in thread: Zeev Suraski: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/sablot php_sablot.h"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> Is this really what the goal is here? It seems like a contest to see how
> many times "Zend" can appear in the code. I think some of this stuff
> should be PHP_ or for things that really are engine related, perhaps
> ENGINE_ to at least pretend that this is a modular architecture where if
> someone was brave enough they could try to use the modularity and plug in
> another engine.
>
> However, if everyone on php-dev thinks the above look to a PHP extension
> is just fine, I'll stop bickering.
>
> -Rasmus
I have to agree with Rasmus entirely. I cannot see any boundary between PHP
and Zend at this point, with differing licences and commercial control over
the engine, I think this is a very bad thing.
Shane
-- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-dev-unsubscribe <email protected> For additional commands, e-mail: php-dev-help <email protected> To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin <email protected>
- Next message: Brian Moore: "[PHP-DEV] profiler?"
- Previous message: Rasmus Lerdorf: "[PHP-DEV] PHP vs. Zend paranoia?"
- In reply to: Rasmus Lerdorf: "[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/sablot php_sablot.h"
- Next in thread: Zeev Suraski: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/sablot php_sablot.h"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

