[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 / NEWS From: Jani Taskinen (sniper <email protected>)
Date: 09/02/01

On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:

>> Was this really necessary? Why couldn't you just write
>> a new function: random() ? And add a ini-option for
>> the mt_* stuff ...
>
>WHOA!!!
>
>I'm not going to discuss this anymore, sorry... I asked dozens of times for
>comments, but didn't get any. Isn't it a bit late to question it now?

I was waiting for you to tell that now the branch works and I could
test it and say 'good, this works you can merge'. I'm sure everybody
else waited for same.

>Though you bring me to an idea... indeed, why not call the new functions
>random() and random_set() (was: srand), then no BC problems...

Leave the old functions as they are and create new function 'random()'
which does not need srand(). So please revert this commit.

--Jani 

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-dev-unsubscribe <email protected>
For additional commands, e-mail: php-dev-help <email protected>
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin <email protected>