Date: 09/05/01
- Next message: Zeev Suraski: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/standard rand.c"
- Previous message: Sterling Hughes: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/standard rand.c"
- In reply to: Sterling Hughes: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/standard rand.c"
- Next in thread: Sterling Hughes: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/standard rand.c"
- Reply: Sterling Hughes: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/standard rand.c"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 05 Sep 2001, Sterling Hughes wrote:
> Ok, I'm sold... I understand the basics of the format and the
> function, but is the following possible?::
>
> In the situation of rand() when its that are two arguments are
> mandatory, or no arguments are mandatory?
I failed to parse this sentence at first, but then I remembered the
Bronx clean-up that Rasmus did on your XSLT stuff and it helped. :)
> Ie,
>
> rand() is valid and rand(1, 100) is valid, but rand(32) is not
> valid?
You can use regular ZEND_NUM_ARGS() check for the first case and use
zend_parse_parameters() for the second.
-Andrei
Any sufficiently advanced Operating System
is indistinguishable from Linux.
- Jim Dennis
-- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-dev-unsubscribe <email protected> For additional commands, e-mail: php-dev-help <email protected> To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin <email protected>
- Next message: Zeev Suraski: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/standard rand.c"
- Previous message: Sterling Hughes: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/standard rand.c"
- In reply to: Sterling Hughes: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/standard rand.c"
- Next in thread: Sterling Hughes: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/standard rand.c"
- Reply: Sterling Hughes: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/standard rand.c"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

