Date: 09/30/01
- Next message: Zak Greant: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] namespaces ambiguity"
- Previous message: Frank M. Kromann: "[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-WIN] time limt"
- In reply to: Andi Gutmans: "[PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] namespaces ambiguity"
- Next in thread: Zak Greant: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] namespaces ambiguity"
- Reply: Zak Greant: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] namespaces ambiguity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
What about "." then (Java/Delphi)?
--Wez.
On 09/30/01, "Andi Gutmans" <andi <email protected>> wrote:
> Well the difference is that C++ can figure out what to do at compile-time.
> I don't think we can which means that it would put more logic into run-time
> which is a bad thing IMO (especially for something new like this).
> Or can you think of a way to differ between these at compile-time?
> Andi
>
> At 09:56 PM 9/30/2001 +0200, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> >:: is taken, but why not do it the C++ way? It also uses :: for both
> >classes and namespaces.
-- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-dev-unsubscribe <email protected> For additional commands, e-mail: php-dev-help <email protected> To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin <email protected>
- Next message: Zak Greant: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] namespaces ambiguity"
- Previous message: Frank M. Kromann: "[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-WIN] time limt"
- In reply to: Andi Gutmans: "[PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] namespaces ambiguity"
- Next in thread: Zak Greant: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] namespaces ambiguity"
- Reply: Zak Greant: "Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] Re: [PHP-DEV] namespaces ambiguity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

