Re: [PHPDOC] Alphabetical order? From: Ted Parnefors (ted <email protected>)
Date: 05/29/00

On Mon, 29 May 2000, Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:

> Ted Parnefors wrote:
> >
> > Just curious... The documentation sometimes seem to list the functions
> > of the different modules in alphabetical order, and sometimes I can see no
> > order at all,
>
> > is this just the way that it all grew out as more and more
> > functions got documented
>
> i fear that's what happend
>
> > or is there some kind of order to it?
>
> not really
>
> i once suggested a more functional grouping within the files,
> but answers where mixed and no decission followed
> (and i didn't push it myself)
> and so things stayed as they are
>
> but maybe its time have restart this and have a serious decision
> this time?
>
> alphabetical ordered summaries can still be obtained using propper
> stylesheets (i'll volunteer for this) while a more functional grouping
> helps especially those who really read a chapter page by page
> (reading about xyz_close() way before xyz_open() doesn't help so much)
>

How was your previous suggestion of ordering ?