Date: 07/03/00
- Next message: Egon Schmid: "[PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /de Translators /it/functions array.xml"
- Previous message: Mike Robinson: "RE: [PHP-DOC] Fw: New part in manual?"
- In reply to: Mike Robinson: "RE: [PHP-DOC] Fw: New part in manual?"
- Next in thread: Mike Robinson: "RE: [PHP-DOC] Fw: New part in manual?"
- Reply: Mike Robinson: "RE: [PHP-DOC] Fw: New part in manual?"
- Reply: Richard Lynch: "Re: [PHP-DOC] Fw: New part in manual?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
----- Original Message -----
From: Mike Robinson <mgrphp3 <email protected>>
To: Stefan Livieratos <stefan <email protected>>
Cc: <phpdoc <email protected>>
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2000 6:14 PM
Subject: RE: [PHP-DOC] Fw: New part in manual?
>
> > We could do that but I think we ought to change the structure soon
> > because the function reference part of the manual is pretty confusing
> > right now.
>
> How is it confusing?
> To me, its about as straight forward as a jelly donut.
>
Well, I suppose you have been working with the manual for
some time, haven't you? I think that newbies get confused when
they have to browse through the long function reference list
which mostly consists of extension descriptions. Don't you think
that splitting the function reference would be more straight forward?
Regards,
Stefan Livieratos
- Next message: Egon Schmid: "[PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /de Translators /it/functions array.xml"
- Previous message: Mike Robinson: "RE: [PHP-DOC] Fw: New part in manual?"
- In reply to: Mike Robinson: "RE: [PHP-DOC] Fw: New part in manual?"
- Next in thread: Mike Robinson: "RE: [PHP-DOC] Fw: New part in manual?"
- Reply: Mike Robinson: "RE: [PHP-DOC] Fw: New part in manual?"
- Reply: Richard Lynch: "Re: [PHP-DOC] Fw: New part in manual?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

