Date: 07/03/00
- Next message: Jesus Castagnetto: "[PHP-DOC] Spanish translation of the PHP manual"
- Previous message: Rui Hirokawa: "[PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /ja/functions var.xml"
- In reply to: Daniel Beckham: "Re: [PHP-DOC] Fw: New part in manual?"
- Next in thread: Daniel Beckham: "RE: [PHP-DOC] Fw: New part in manual?"
- Reply: Daniel Beckham: "RE: [PHP-DOC] Fw: New part in manual?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Beckham wrote:
> Yes, you are right and I use that all the time.. I guess, I was more
> thinking of when I first started using php.. heck, I'm still finding
> functions squirreled away in the manual every now and then. Now that I'm
> familiar with it, it's not a problem. I think the library functions are
> setup nicely.. it's just builtin stuff...
So, how does changing 'Function Reference -> String Functions -> md5()'
to 'Standard Function Reference -> String Functions -> md5()' help? Or
do anything except add another click for users and another 50/50 guess
for newcomers (read: bug report)?
I see your point entirely. I don't see the point of this change though.
Maybe if we got some feedback from the users list; a couple of dozen
"yeah do it"s would make me see the error of my ways. Hell, I'd stop
doing donuts intravenously. :)
Don't get me wrong. I'm not opposed to change, but the manual, as is,
is a work of art. I wouldn't curl the lip on the Mona Lisa just cuz I think
she needs to look happier.
.mike
- Next message: Jesus Castagnetto: "[PHP-DOC] Spanish translation of the PHP manual"
- Previous message: Rui Hirokawa: "[PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /ja/functions var.xml"
- In reply to: Daniel Beckham: "Re: [PHP-DOC] Fw: New part in manual?"
- Next in thread: Daniel Beckham: "RE: [PHP-DOC] Fw: New part in manual?"
- Reply: Daniel Beckham: "RE: [PHP-DOC] Fw: New part in manual?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

