RE: [PHP-DOC] Manual Errata Suggestions... From: James Moore (james <email protected>)
Date: 07/28/00

>Okay, I went through 50 posts, starting with what was 500.
>This is what it looks like to me.. to whom should this be
>sent?

OK

>(I wound up in "date".)
>
>AGGR = Mutiple posting to be aggregated (edit, delete duplicates)
>BUG? = Possible bug to look into (delete)
>DOCU = Something possibly good to add to the main docs. (keep, send
upstream)
>FLAM = Frustration/venting/pointless (delete)
>FRMT = Reformat/Edit to be legible (edit)
>RTFM = in the documentaion (delete)
>SUPQ = Support question (delete)
Id Add one more, ERRO = Error in docs. (Check latest ver to see if its
corrected, else forward)
>
Sounds like a good starting point, any ideas?
>
>I left posts which were helpful _responses_ to support questions,
>as those make for good annotations(?) once cleaned up.
>
OK Rather than it being a mad dash through the manual with us all doing the
same section as eveyone else (ada_afetch will gets lots of attention if we
do that) its probably an idea for anyone who has signed up to help to
take/be given a section that they are familiar with and initally start from
that. Aim to get the manual cleaned and then perhaps we could have any new
annotations sent to a new/current list (I dont know which one currently) So
they can be delt with if needed, looking through there seem to be very few
*Good* anotations.

Also is it possible to get the php.net manual on a weekly build so that it
stays upto date rather than lagging behind the actual docs where corrections
might have been made. 

--
James Moore
James <email protected>