Date: 07/28/00
- Next message: Egon Schmid: "[PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en/functions curl.xml"
- Previous message: jalal: "[PHP-DOC] Re: [PHP-QA] Dealing with the PHP manual annotations"
- In reply to: Ron Chmara: "Re: [PHP-DOC] Dealing with the PHP manual annotations (was Re: [PHP-QA]Just a tiny thing)"
- Next in thread: Egon Schmid: "Re: [PHP-DOC] Dealing with the PHP manual annotations (was Re:[PHP-QA]Just a tiny thing)"
- Reply: Egon Schmid: "Re: [PHP-DOC] Dealing with the PHP manual annotations (was Re:[PHP-QA]Just a tiny thing)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 27 Jul 2000, Ron Chmara wrote:
>1. Annotations themselves have feedback, at the bottom of the annotation list.
Just one though: What if those annotations were mailed to the php-doc
list just like bug-reports are mailed to php-dev? Those are (or
should be) after all kind of 'bug-reports' of uncomplete/incorrect documentation?
And they could have some kind of info about which document is in question?
This way the documentation group could react much quicker to them. Either
correcting the documentation or replying to the sender with a proper
response. Like this: 'This is not documentation issue, please report as
bug in bugs.php.net', or 'This is corrected in CVS...
But this idea is of course for future annotations only. There is much to
do with the existing database.
--Jani
- Next message: Egon Schmid: "[PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en/functions curl.xml"
- Previous message: jalal: "[PHP-DOC] Re: [PHP-QA] Dealing with the PHP manual annotations"
- In reply to: Ron Chmara: "Re: [PHP-DOC] Dealing with the PHP manual annotations (was Re: [PHP-QA]Just a tiny thing)"
- Next in thread: Egon Schmid: "Re: [PHP-DOC] Dealing with the PHP manual annotations (was Re:[PHP-QA]Just a tiny thing)"
- Reply: Egon Schmid: "Re: [PHP-DOC] Dealing with the PHP manual annotations (was Re:[PHP-QA]Just a tiny thing)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

