Date: 08/25/00
- Next message: Daniel Beckham: "Re: [PHP-DOC] Output Buffering: Is strings.xml the best place?"
- Previous message: Daniel Beckham: "Re: [PHP-DOC] Output Buffering: Is strings.xml the best place?"
- In reply to: Daniel Beckham: "Re: [PHP-DOC] Output Buffering: Is strings.xml the best place?"
- Next in thread: Daniel Beckham: "Re: [PHP-DOC] Output Buffering: Is strings.xml the best place?"
- Reply: Daniel Beckham: "Re: [PHP-DOC] Output Buffering: Is strings.xml the best place?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Beckham wrote:
>
> Egon is right, you could write a nice partinfo for the section and Hatmut
> here has a good idea. The flush function should also be moved to the same
> section. There is also a fflush() function that's not been documented yet.
fflush() is something different that should be documented in
'Filesystem'
> If we go with a new section, what should it be called, Output Control or
> Output Buffering sound great to me.
I't vote for "Output Control" as other output-related stuff that is not
directly related to buffering might fit in there too
(thinking of nothing special right now, but there was a feature request
regarding style of error-message output (HTML/XHTML) for example)
-- Hartmut Holzgraefe hartmut <email protected> http://www.six.de +49-711-99091-77 fax:-99
- Next message: Daniel Beckham: "Re: [PHP-DOC] Output Buffering: Is strings.xml the best place?"
- Previous message: Daniel Beckham: "Re: [PHP-DOC] Output Buffering: Is strings.xml the best place?"
- In reply to: Daniel Beckham: "Re: [PHP-DOC] Output Buffering: Is strings.xml the best place?"
- Next in thread: Daniel Beckham: "Re: [PHP-DOC] Output Buffering: Is strings.xml the best place?"
- Reply: Daniel Beckham: "Re: [PHP-DOC] Output Buffering: Is strings.xml the best place?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

