Date: 08/25/00
- Next message: Daniel Beckham: "[PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en/functions outcontrol.xml"
- Previous message: Hartmut Holzgraefe: "Re: [PHP-DOC] Output Buffering: Is strings.xml the best place?"
- In reply to: Hartmut Holzgraefe: "Re: [PHP-DOC] Output Buffering: Is strings.xml the best place?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Easy enough. I'll go ahead and start the file and add it to cvs once we
think it's good enough, I can add it to the chapters section.
Daniel
----- Original Message -----
From: "Hartmut Holzgraefe" <hartmut <email protected>>
To: "Daniel Beckham" <danbeck <email protected>>
Cc: "phpdoc" <phpdoc <email protected>>
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2000 9:29 AM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DOC] Output Buffering: Is strings.xml the best place?
> Daniel Beckham wrote:
> >
> > Egon is right, you could write a nice partinfo for the section and
Hatmut
> > here has a good idea. The flush function should also be moved to the
same
> > section. There is also a fflush() function that's not been documented
yet.
>
> fflush() is something different that should be documented in
> 'Filesystem'
>
> > If we go with a new section, what should it be called, Output Control or
> > Output Buffering sound great to me.
>
> I't vote for "Output Control" as other output-related stuff that is not
> directly related to buffering might fit in there too
>
> (thinking of nothing special right now, but there was a feature request
> regarding style of error-message output (HTML/XHTML) for example)
>
> --
> Hartmut Holzgraefe
> hartmut <email protected> http://www.six.de +49-711-99091-77 fax:-99
>
- Next message: Daniel Beckham: "[PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en/functions outcontrol.xml"
- Previous message: Hartmut Holzgraefe: "Re: [PHP-DOC] Output Buffering: Is strings.xml the best place?"
- In reply to: Hartmut Holzgraefe: "Re: [PHP-DOC] Output Buffering: Is strings.xml the best place?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

