Date: 07/10/01
- Next message: Hojtsy Gabor: "Re: [PHP-DOC] faqfiles [refentry is not so good]"
- Previous message: Hojtsy Gabor: "[PHP-DOC] faqfiles [refentry is not so good]"
- In reply to: Hojtsy Gabor: "[PHP-DOC] faqfiles [refentry is not so good]"
- Next in thread: Hojtsy Gabor: "Re: [PHP-DOC] faqfiles [refentry is not so good]"
- Reply: Hojtsy Gabor: "Re: [PHP-DOC] faqfiles [refentry is not so good]"
- Reply: Damien Seguy: "Re: [PHP-DOC] faqfiles [refentry is not so good]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hello,
as far as I know DocBook supports Q&A sections, see:
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/docbook/chapter/book/qandaset.html
I think that would be the best way to do it, as it was made for this
purpose.
Derick
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Hojtsy Gabor wrote:
> Hi Damien and the others!
>
> I have just built the new manual with the FAQ section...
> I was curious :) But the results are not really good...
>
> Maybe refentry is not the best wat to store the faq.
> It would be better to generate fewer but longer pages...
>
> I am not saying I would like to see the FAQ on one
> page (it is not soo friendly now), but now this is
> too splinterd.
>
> Goba
>
Derick Rethans
---------------------------------------------------------------------
PHP: Scripting the Web - www.php.net - derick <email protected>
SRM: Site Resource Manager - www.vl-srm.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------
- Next message: Hojtsy Gabor: "Re: [PHP-DOC] faqfiles [refentry is not so good]"
- Previous message: Hojtsy Gabor: "[PHP-DOC] faqfiles [refentry is not so good]"
- In reply to: Hojtsy Gabor: "[PHP-DOC] faqfiles [refentry is not so good]"
- Next in thread: Hojtsy Gabor: "Re: [PHP-DOC] faqfiles [refentry is not so good]"
- Reply: Hojtsy Gabor: "Re: [PHP-DOC] faqfiles [refentry is not so good]"
- Reply: Damien Seguy: "Re: [PHP-DOC] faqfiles [refentry is not so good]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

