Date: 07/10/01
- Next message: Hojtsy Gabor: "Re: [PHP-DOC] faqfiles [refentry is not so good]"
- Previous message: Hojtsy Gabor: "Re: [PHP-DOC] Manual building"
- In reply to: Damien Seguy: "Re: [PHP-DOC] faqfiles [refentry is not so good]"
- Next in thread: Daniel Beckham: "Re: [PHP-DOC] faqfiles [refentry is not so good]"
- Reply: Daniel Beckham: "Re: [PHP-DOC] faqfiles [refentry is not so good]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> > as far as I know DocBook supports Q&A sections, see:
> > http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/docbook/chapter/book/qandaset.html
> That is too easy : you read the docs =D
>
> OK, this sound MUCH better to me. Here is an updated version.
> Goba : can you test this on your Jade?
Ehm. Erhm. You should read the docs more carefully.
qandaset is not allowed in refentry context....
Errors:
general.xml:12:11:E: document type does not allow element "qandaset" here
end tag for "reference" which is not finished
Please try again :)
Goba
- Next message: Hojtsy Gabor: "Re: [PHP-DOC] faqfiles [refentry is not so good]"
- Previous message: Hojtsy Gabor: "Re: [PHP-DOC] Manual building"
- In reply to: Damien Seguy: "Re: [PHP-DOC] faqfiles [refentry is not so good]"
- Next in thread: Daniel Beckham: "Re: [PHP-DOC] faqfiles [refentry is not so good]"
- Reply: Daniel Beckham: "Re: [PHP-DOC] faqfiles [refentry is not so good]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

