Date: 09/06/01
- Next message: Wolfgang Drews: "[PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /de/functions exec.xml fdf.xml"
- Previous message: Hojtsy Gabor: "Re: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /de/functions exec.xml"
- In reply to: Hojtsy Gabor: "Re: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /de/functions exec.xml"
- Next in thread: Hojtsy Gabor: "Re: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /de/functions exec.xml"
- Reply: Hojtsy Gabor: "Re: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /de/functions exec.xml"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> > -<!-- $Revision: 1.7 $ -->
> > +<!-- $Revision: 1.8 $ -->
>
> This CVS Revision tag is not intended to be placed in the translated
> files. You would gain much with the EN-Revision comment (not modified
> by CVS), we are talking about for some time. In our proposed revision
> system, it is just confusing to use this kind of $Revision comment
> in translated files.
Hi Goba,
did i get you right, you just do not want them as comment in the
translated files, right?
They aren't in te other translated files either, so i actually
do not know, why Egon has set this one. Maybe just, because i
forgot to erase it from the original when i translated the file.
- confusing - I will remove it again.
Can you shortly tell me about the EN-Revision comment thing you
talked about? i haven't read this one ... ;)
with best regards,
-Wolfgang
-- Deutscher PHP-Knotenpunkt Dynamic Web Pages: http://www.dynamicwebpages.de Scripte, Tutorials, Installation, Bücher, BestofGML, Manual, Links uvm. PHP 4: Dynamische Webauftritte professionell realisieren: http://php-buch.de
- Next message: Wolfgang Drews: "[PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /de/functions exec.xml fdf.xml"
- Previous message: Hojtsy Gabor: "Re: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /de/functions exec.xml"
- In reply to: Hojtsy Gabor: "Re: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /de/functions exec.xml"
- Next in thread: Hojtsy Gabor: "Re: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /de/functions exec.xml"
- Reply: Hojtsy Gabor: "Re: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /de/functions exec.xml"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

