Re: [PHP-DOC] include vs. require doc updates From: Hojtsy Gabor (goba <email protected>)
Date: 10/13/01

> Essentially, the only difference now is require() produces a Fatal Error
> while include produces a Warning.

In what case? Why are these not identical. IMHO it would be the
best for us to be able to use require and include interchangeably,
so they can be the same now.

> Should the main documentation live within one and refer to the other?
> Kinda like printf does to sprintf. I'm thinking include would contain
> the bulk, require referring to it. Or, someone could flip a coin :) Of
> course require docs wouldn't be totally bare but ...

Include should be the main one IMHO, as include_dir, and other
constructs/values/functions use the include word, and it represents
that the file is included.

Though I have no time to do it, as the win32/install.txt => install.xml
information merging is not completed, and I said, I'll try
to find the time... I am working on it.

Goba