Date: 01/14/02
- Next message: Philip Olson: "Re: [PHP-DOC] manual build issues"
- Previous message: Edin Kadribasic: "Re: [PHP-DOC] Obsolete modules in php4?"
- In reply to: Edin Kadribasic: "Re: [PHP-DOC] Obsolete modules in php4?"
- Next in thread: Gabor Hojtsy: "Re: [PHP-DOC] Obsolete modules in php4?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
From: "Edin Kadribasic" <edink <email protected>>
> > > > > Modules like iisfunc are moved to pear/PECL.
> > > > > Documents for them should be moved to pear.
> > > > >
> > > > > Or am I wrong?
> > > >
> > > > Yes.
> > >
> > > It would be nice if the documentation is kept in one place so
> > people don't
> > > have to remember where the function came from.
> >
> > Do you mean with "one place" peardoc or phpdoc?
>
> I meant phpdoc. People are used to www.php.net/funcname. The
documentation
> should have some standard note that this module is part of PECL
and how you
> can install it (which is hard to tell right now :).
Cool! I have heared that peardoc is a programing language for
documentation. So it is the best to leave the docs in its old
location and make a notice in the partintro for the new location for
the source files.
-Egon
- Next message: Philip Olson: "Re: [PHP-DOC] manual build issues"
- Previous message: Edin Kadribasic: "Re: [PHP-DOC] Obsolete modules in php4?"
- In reply to: Edin Kadribasic: "Re: [PHP-DOC] Obsolete modules in php4?"
- Next in thread: Gabor Hojtsy: "Re: [PHP-DOC] Obsolete modules in php4?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

