Re: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en/reference/domxml/functions DomXsltStylesheet-process.xml domxml-xslt-stylesheet-doc.xml domxml-xslt-stylesheet-file.xml domxml-xslt-stylesheet.xml From: Christian Stocker (chregu <email protected>)
Date: 07/31/02

On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:

> > > > would it make sense to have all xml files with lower case names?
> > > > I notice this particularly with domxml stuff.
> > >
> > > Well, DomXML is special in phpdoc (similarly to ming) where
> > > we have classes and methods, but not functions... How they
> > > are currently documented is not the best way to go (as discussed
> > > earlier at the documentation meeting). So the documentation should
> > > be reorganized to use DocBook 4 OO features and not simply document
> > > class methods as PHP functions...
> >
> > Since this was my more or less first commit to phpdoc, I was not very
> > sure, if I did it the right way :) But it looks like others had the same
> > problems (meaning with methods not functions). I would be very happy, if
> > there will be a solution to this problem. Or is there already one?
>
> DocBook 4 has support for OO documentation. However, as far as I know,
> the rendering is not too cute so it should be enhanced. But I have too
> many things to do now here in phpdoc, so I can only add it to the bottom
> of my TODO list (BWT it's already in the metting protocol and maybe in
> the TODO too). See phpdoc/RFC and phpdoc/TODO

Thanks for the information. And the not-support of OO should not stop us
from enhancing the documentation of domxml :)

chregu 

-- 
PHP Documentation Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php