Date: 07/31/02
- Next message: Gabor Hojtsy: "[PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /scripts missing-entities.php.in"
- Previous message: Christian Stocker: "Re: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en/reference/domxml/functions DomXsltStylesheet-process.xml domxml-xslt-stylesheet-doc.xml domxml-xslt-stylesheet-file.xml domxml-xslt-stylesheet.xml"
- In reply to: Christian Stocker: "Re: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en/reference/domxml/functions DomXsltStylesheet-process.xml domxml-xslt-stylesheet-doc.xml domxml-xslt-stylesheet-file.xml domxml-xslt-stylesheet.xml"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> > DocBook 4 has support for OO documentation. However, as far as I know,
> > the rendering is not too cute so it should be enhanced. But I have too
> > many things to do now here in phpdoc, so I can only add it to the bottom
> > of my TODO list (BWT it's already in the metting protocol and maybe in
> > the TODO too). See phpdoc/RFC and phpdoc/TODO
>
> Thanks for the information. And the not-support of OO should not stop us
> from enhancing the documentation of domxml :)
IMHO you can use the current format. As long as I can see the notations
used are easy to convert programatically, so as long as we'll have a
thought-out method to document the OO parts, then we can convert the docs
hopefully automatically.
Goba
-- PHP Documentation Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
- Next message: Gabor Hojtsy: "[PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /scripts missing-entities.php.in"
- Previous message: Christian Stocker: "Re: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en/reference/domxml/functions DomXsltStylesheet-process.xml domxml-xslt-stylesheet-doc.xml domxml-xslt-stylesheet-file.xml domxml-xslt-stylesheet.xml"
- In reply to: Christian Stocker: "Re: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en/reference/domxml/functions DomXsltStylesheet-process.xml domxml-xslt-stylesheet-doc.xml domxml-xslt-stylesheet-file.xml domxml-xslt-stylesheet.xml"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

