Re: [PHP-DOC] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-DOC] Apache 2 installation instructions From: Friedhelm Betz (holliwell <email protected>)
Date: 10/29/02

Hallo Melvyn,

Tuesday, October 29, 2002, 9:55:31 AM, you wrote:

> At 08:43 29-10-2002, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:

>> > The aspect people complaining about is more a version thingie, e.g.
>> > they try to set up php 4.2.3 with apache 2.0.43 and this could not
>> > succeed. Is it really necessary to document that apache 2.03x works
>> > only with php 4.2.x1, php4.2.x2 and apache 2.04x only with php4.2y1
>> > or php4.2.y2? It should be clearly mentioned, that the support for
>> > apache2 isn't production stable ;-)
>>
>>I think, it would be nice to add information to one place, the documentation
>>about Apache 2 support.
>>
>> 1. It's not production ready

> Ah yes - but that will contradict greatly, to "the best version yet" marketing
> trick the Apache Group is advertising on their front page.
> We can mention it to users, in the bug db etc. But officially documenting, that
> Apache 2 is really a beta product, doesn't really express consistency, between
> the "family".

I thought it more from another point of view: the support for apache2
in php is not production stable ,e.g. the sapi in php :-)
Maybe this is due to the fact (?) that apache2 is still beta (I really
don't know) but form the php-side point of view, php-versions are not
production stable in conjunction with apache2. As Derick said, I don't
think this will hurt someone of the apachegroup.

[...]

but besides this, it would be kind, if just someone could provide some
infos from the php-side, like the *.exe names one windows ;-)

 Friedhelm 

-- 
PHP Documentation Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php