Date: 01/12/03
- Next message: eManual: "[PHP-DOC] :: i need karma ::"
- Previous message: Sara MG: "Re: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en language-snippets.ent"
- In reply to: Derick Rethans: "Re: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en/reference/filesystem/functions fclose.xml feof.xml fflush.xml fgetc.xml fgetcsv.xml fgets.xml fgetss.xml flock.xml fopen.xml fpassthru.xml fputs.xml fread.xml fscanf.xml"
- Next in thread: Tularis: "Re: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en/reference/filesystem/functions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>> > I'm personnally -1 on using "handle" as the parameter name, but it's
>> a weak -1... maybe more of a -0.5
>>
>> Well, $fp is something kinda "leftover" for "file pointer". As fopen
>> opens many more things then files (eg. STDIN :), it technically not a
>> file pointer anymore. Therefore I think handle is better ;)
>
> I'm for "handle" too.
>
> Derick
>
Okay, I'll switch all these to "handle" instead of "fp" (and I do see your
points and reasonings) and look for other similar instances to keep up
consistency.
I'm off to the aquarium today though, so don't look for the commits until
tonight.
-Pollita
-- PHP Documentation Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
- Next message: eManual: "[PHP-DOC] :: i need karma ::"
- Previous message: Sara MG: "Re: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en language-snippets.ent"
- In reply to: Derick Rethans: "Re: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en/reference/filesystem/functions fclose.xml feof.xml fflush.xml fgetc.xml fgetcsv.xml fgets.xml fgetss.xml flock.xml fopen.xml fpassthru.xml fputs.xml fread.xml fscanf.xml"
- Next in thread: Tularis: "Re: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en/reference/filesystem/functions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

