Date: 02/02/03
- Next message: philip <email protected>: "[PHP-DOC] #22008 [Bgs->Opn]: fgetss : 0 vs false, html on multiple lines"
- Previous message: Maxim Maletsky: "[PHP-DOC] Re: [PHP-NOTES] note 24997 deleted from function.file by philip"
- In reply to: Maxim Maletsky: "Re: [PHP-DOC] Re: PHP documentation authors / editors and license"
- Next in thread: Maxim Maletsky: "Re: [PHP-DOC] proto-skript [was authors....]"
- Reply: Maxim Maletsky: "Re: [PHP-DOC] proto-skript [was authors....]"
- Reply: Hartmut Holzgraefe: "Re: [PHP-DOC] proto-skript [was authors....]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> > I have heard some rumors about someone creating a proto check script to
> > check whether the protos in phpdoc reflect the current protos of
> > functions in the php source. Take in account undocumented new
> > parameters, etc. too... I don't think that anybody can get on this to do
> > it manually in any reasonable time...
>
> Would be nice to investigate on this deeper and see whether we can do
> something about it. I could go ahead to write a similar script myself.
Take a look at /phpdoc/scripts/xml_proto.php
never tried, but may be a good starting point.
Friedhelm
-- PHP Documentation Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
- Next message: philip <email protected>: "[PHP-DOC] #22008 [Bgs->Opn]: fgetss : 0 vs false, html on multiple lines"
- Previous message: Maxim Maletsky: "[PHP-DOC] Re: [PHP-NOTES] note 24997 deleted from function.file by philip"
- In reply to: Maxim Maletsky: "Re: [PHP-DOC] Re: PHP documentation authors / editors and license"
- Next in thread: Maxim Maletsky: "Re: [PHP-DOC] proto-skript [was authors....]"
- Reply: Maxim Maletsky: "Re: [PHP-DOC] proto-skript [was authors....]"
- Reply: Hartmut Holzgraefe: "Re: [PHP-DOC] proto-skript [was authors....]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

