 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
Date: 02/20/03
- Next message: sniper <email protected>: "[PHP-DOC] #22342 [Opn->Bgs]: the behaviour of require(..) or die(..); is non-intuitive"
- Previous message: Philip Olson: "[PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en language-snippets.ent /en/reference/filesystem/functions file-exists.xml is-dir.xml is-executable.xml is-file.xml is-link.xml is-writable.xml"
- Next in thread: sniper <email protected>: "[PHP-DOC] #22342 [Opn->Bgs]: the behaviour of require(..) or die(..); is non-intuitive"
- Reply: sniper <email protected>: "[PHP-DOC] #22342 [Opn->Bgs]: the behaviour of require(..) or die(..); is non-intuitive"
- Reply: hholzgra <email protected>: "[PHP-DOC] #22342 [Bgs->Dup]: the behaviour of require(..) or die(..); is non-intuitive"
- Reply: sniper <email protected>: "[PHP-DOC] #22342 [Dup->Bgs]: the behaviour of require(..) or die(..); is non-intuitive"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
From: peter-phpbug at dataloss dot nl
Operating system: Linux
PHP version: 4.3.1
PHP Bug Type: Documentation problem
Bug description: the behaviour of require(..) or die(..); is non-intuitive
If one would use a line similar to
require("include/xhtml11.php") or die("argh!");
php will fail stating it cannot open "1".
The more intuitive result can be obtained by doing
(require("include/xhtml11.php")) or die("argh!");
I know that require or die is wrong, since require is not a function.
However, due to the way precedence (apparently) works with require, the
result is non-intuitive and confusing (I am assuming php is evaluating
'(..) or die(..)' to 'true', which is 1).
-- Edit bug report at http://bugs.php.net/?id=22342&edit=1 -- Try a CVS snapshot: http://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=22342&r=trysnapshot Fixed in CVS: http://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=22342&r=fixedcvs Fixed in release: http://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=22342&r=alreadyfixed Need backtrace: http://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=22342&r=needtrace Try newer version: http://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=22342&r=oldversion Not developer issue: http://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=22342&r=support Expected behavior: http://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=22342&r=notwrong Not enough info: http://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=22342&r=notenoughinfo Submitted twice: http://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=22342&r=submittedtwice register_globals: http://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=22342&r=globals PHP 3 support discontinued: http://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=22342&r=php3 Daylight Savings: http://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=22342&r=dst IIS Stability: http://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=22342&r=isapi Install GNU Sed: http://bugs.php.net/fix.php?id=22342&r=gnused-- PHP Documentation Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
- Next message: sniper <email protected>: "[PHP-DOC] #22342 [Opn->Bgs]: the behaviour of require(..) or die(..); is non-intuitive"
- Previous message: Philip Olson: "[PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en language-snippets.ent /en/reference/filesystem/functions file-exists.xml is-dir.xml is-executable.xml is-file.xml is-link.xml is-writable.xml"
- Next in thread: sniper <email protected>: "[PHP-DOC] #22342 [Opn->Bgs]: the behaviour of require(..) or die(..); is non-intuitive"
- Reply: sniper <email protected>: "[PHP-DOC] #22342 [Opn->Bgs]: the behaviour of require(..) or die(..); is non-intuitive"
- Reply: hholzgra <email protected>: "[PHP-DOC] #22342 [Bgs->Dup]: the behaviour of require(..) or die(..); is non-intuitive"
- Reply: sniper <email protected>: "[PHP-DOC] #22342 [Dup->Bgs]: the behaviour of require(..) or die(..); is non-intuitive"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]