Date: 04/15/01
- Next message: Plutarck: "Re: [PHP-WIN] MySQL problem"
- Previous message: Plutarck: "Re: [PHP-WIN] Need PHP/MySQL Assistance"
- In reply to: Plutarck: "Re: [PHP-WIN] MySql pconnect"
- Next in thread: Plutarck: "Re: [PHP-WIN] MySql pconnect"
- Reply: Plutarck: "Re: [PHP-WIN] MySql pconnect"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>
> For connect vs. pconnect, the instances where you should use pconnect are
> really rare.
>
> When in doubt, use connect. If you know of a specifically good
> reason to use
> it, then feel free.
>
> But I personally have never had a situation where pconnect worked better
> than connect.
pconnect is better to use IMHO on any site with a decent amount of hits as
youll get better performance due to the lack of the overhead of making a new
connection every time a page is called. I would totally disagree with you
here plutarck pconnect is there to make things quicker which it does by
keeping the connection open between page requests.
> And as for extended server status, I haven't a clue about it :)
Never looked into it really.. probably not worth it.. try asking on the
php-db list.
-James
-- James Moore jmoore <email protected> http://www.perl.com/search/index.php - we must be doing somthing right-- PHP Windows Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-windows-unsubscribe <email protected> For additional commands, e-mail: php-windows-help <email protected> To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin <email protected>
- Next message: Plutarck: "Re: [PHP-WIN] MySQL problem"
- Previous message: Plutarck: "Re: [PHP-WIN] Need PHP/MySQL Assistance"
- In reply to: Plutarck: "Re: [PHP-WIN] MySql pconnect"
- Next in thread: Plutarck: "Re: [PHP-WIN] MySql pconnect"
- Reply: Plutarck: "Re: [PHP-WIN] MySql pconnect"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

