Date: 04/18/01
- Next message: Chris Johnson: "RE: [phplib] Re: The future of PHPlib"
- Previous message: Faine, Mark: "[phplib] Oracle 8.1.6 CT_Split_Sql or CT_SQL"
- In reply to: Jonathan Tullett: "RE: [phplib] Re: The future of PHPlib"
- Next in thread: phplib: "RE: [phplib] Re: The future of PHPlib"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Not to worry about a holy war from me. Clearly, you have an example
which works and I would not argue with that. I only meant to speak in
generalities. I meant only to address the inefficiency problems with
PHP running as a called-then-forgotten CGI or module from a web server,
compared to the ability to maintain context and data over multiple web
hits that an application server could provide.
The best answer is, of course: "it depends".
Regards,
..chris
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Tullett [mailto:jtullett <email protected>]
> The site is 98% written in PHP (with a few perl backends) running on a
> mixture of sybase, postgres and mysql databases, and doesnt have many
> performance problems.
>
> We have 7 proxy servers, which are all either dual p3 733 or dual p3
> 833 which arent exactly top of the range.
> --
> Jonathan Tullett
> Systems Administrator
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: phplib-unsubscribe <email protected>
For additional commands, e-mail: phplib-help <email protected>
- Next message: Chris Johnson: "RE: [phplib] Re: The future of PHPlib"
- Previous message: Faine, Mark: "[phplib] Oracle 8.1.6 CT_Split_Sql or CT_SQL"
- In reply to: Jonathan Tullett: "RE: [phplib] Re: The future of PHPlib"
- Next in thread: phplib: "RE: [phplib] Re: The future of PHPlib"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

