Date: 07/21/01
- Next message: giancarlo pinerolo: "Re: [phplib] BEA Weblogic (was) Re: [phplib] [RFC] Future of phplib"
- Previous message: Tarique Sani
email protected>>: "[phplib] BEA Weblogic (was) Re: [phplib] [RFC] Future of phplib" - In reply to: Arno A. Karner: "[phplib] common document api vs templates"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 8:28 PM -0500 21/7/01, Arno A. Karner wrote:
>I have not used templates, and do expect to get flammed, but the reason
>evry body gives for using templates is to seperate idiot web page
>designers from the code. i can agree with that, but having to design the
>same template over ands over again for the flavor of the month mark up
>laguage seems a waste of time too. there is currently 3 hand held device
>markup languages and
Since I'm the person accused of shooting Arno's idea down in flames, I'd
like to say that I think the PHPAPP framework proposed is an excellent idea.
I'm working on a similar process at the moment where I deconstruct the form
created by the designer, convert it into a template and then process it
with template.inc. Obviously a horrible hack, and PHPAPP or something built
around XSLT is obviously a superior option.
I'm all for including Arno's idea as an optional extension to PHPLIB, the
way cart.inc and template.inc are optional at present.
...Richard.
-- Abbestellen mit Mail an: phplib-unsubscribe <email protected> Kommandoliste mit Mail an: phplib-help <email protected>
- Next message: giancarlo pinerolo: "Re: [phplib] BEA Weblogic (was) Re: [phplib] [RFC] Future of phplib"
- Previous message: Tarique Sani
email protected>>: "[phplib] BEA Weblogic (was) Re: [phplib] [RFC] Future of phplib" - In reply to: Arno A. Karner: "[phplib] common document api vs templates"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

